文学与跨文化研究（二）：价值观、身份认同与对话 - 中国高校教材图书网
|
|
| 内容简介： |
“文学与跨文化研究系列”由国内外相关领域专家学者共同编写完成。本系列立足于比较文学与跨文化交流，通过构建世界文学网络，对文本、语言进行理论层面、文化层面和实际层面的分析，解构了文学作品中所体现的新旧文化交替，思想碰撞，历史背景和先锋理念，并探讨其对于当代社会问题和伦理问题的启发。
本系列迄今已出版8辑，本书为第9辑。全书分为两大板块，重点剖析文学作品中关于社会价值问题，身份自我认同和跨文化对话的思考。在全球沟通交流常态化的当下，跨文化交流所面临的挑战亟待解决，文学研究的启示作用变得日趋重要。
|
| 作者简介： |
|
|
| 章节目录： |
Intercultural Research Series Foreword Michael H．Prosser
Volume Preface
Cultural Patterns of Communication-Values-Identity Struggles
A New Stage of Comparative Literature： An Introduction to
the New SISU Ph．D．Program - Comparative Literature and Intercultural Studies
Section One Comparative Analyses of Literary Value Constructions
1．Value and Canonicity： The Making of World Literature
2．Cultures of Honor， Cultures of Face： Literary Representations of Gendered Values
3．Writing Maafa： Narratives of Violence in the Works of Daniel Defoe， Jane Austen， Audre Lorde， and Fred D'Aguiar
4．Comparative Sexual Ethics： William Faulkner and Mo Yan
5．Chinese Literature "Going Abroad"' The Case of Big Breasts and Wide Hips
6．Women and National Development： A Comparative Study
……
Section Two Perspectives on Migration
About the Authors
About the Series
|
| 精彩片段： |
Ancient Athens served as an intercultural and intellectual crossroads for Asia and Europe. The Greek philosopher，Socrates' famous statement 6*1 am neither a citizen of Athens，nor of Greece，but of the world" speaks eloquently of the impact of intercultural communication，comparative analysis，and the importance of identity clarification both in his and contemporary society. Greek philosophers Socrates，Plato，and Aristotle all looked outward from their own culture，identifying or debating major world value orientations such as goodness，justice，truth，and happiness. For East Asia，multiple schools of thought developed during the Spring and Autumn Period，shaping China's cross-state communication. Confucius' Analects articulated the role of ren（benevolence and kindness），li（propriety and right living through ritual） ，de（moral power） ，dao（internalized moral direction） ，and mianzi or lian（externalized social image and harmony）. These Confucian orientations were integrated into what became the fabric of not only the Chinese state，but the educational and philosophical orientation of much of East and South-Eastern Asia.
All of these early cultural conceptualizations of identities and values strongly support the potentially positive intercultural，multicultural，and global world orientations that have enhanced a dialogue of civilizations and cultures，and stress factors that are unifying rather than divisive. The challenge continues to be substantial since intercultural，multicultural，and global communication might just as easily be highly negative with increasing war，poverty，crime，and pandemics.The goal of all those interested in promoting a better local and global society vastly prefers the former.
The location from which this series originates shows some of these dynamics and contradictions. Just as each nation and people
must deal with highs and lows，China is grappling both with some of the positive dialogues of modernization and internationalization，and with the hallenges of divergent cultural or global discourses. From the depths of the Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan that rallied not only the nation's，but the orld's sympathy，engagement and commitment to rebuild，to the heights of the spectacularly well-orchestrated and successful 2008 Beijing Olympics； from the ongoing challenges of natural disasters like floods or human tragedies and accidents or the global financial crisis，to the futuristic development of Shanghai and its visionary and record-breaking participation and cooperation at the 2010 Shanghai Expo，we see these human and intercultural dynamics at work.
I would suggest that intercultural communication as a field has emerged to embody and embrace both these challenges of human clashes and the dialogues across cultures and civilizations. The anthropologists Edward T. Hall and R'uth Benedict serve as the symbolic grandparents of intercultural communication in North America，though neither set out to begin a new field. Others in North America in the 1960s and 1970s and coming from various viewpoints（see Vol. 2 for the complete list of influencing scholars） and I sought early to develop an intercultural communication discipline or sub-discipline，which has now spread broadly through much of the academic world.
|
| 书 评： |
|
|
| 其 它： |
|
|
|
