法学教授教你怎样写论文 - 培生法学课堂 - 中国高校教材图书网
|
书名： |
法学教授教你怎样写论文
培生法学课堂
|
| ISBN： | 978-7-5609-9521-2 |
条码： | |
| 作者： |
(英)SteveFoster[著]
相关图书
|
装订： | 0 |
| 印次： | 1-1 |
开本： | 16开 |
| 定价： |
￥38.00
折扣价：￥36.10
折扣：0.95
节省了1.9元
|
字数： |
|
| 出版社： |
华中科技大学出版社 |
页数： |
251页
|
| 发行编号： | |
每包册数： |
|
| 出版日期： |
2014-01-01 |
|
|
| 内容简介： |
|
《法学教授教你怎样写论文：经典范例、问题解答 写作技巧（第3版）》一书，是一本指导法学论文写作的经典教材。本书在内容上，首先，为读者们提供了本科阶段学生所需要撰写论文的主要类型。第二，详细地介绍了论文写作的要素以及各种写作技巧。第三，通过书中所使用的各种案例范本及具体的论文写作知识，为读者分辨优劣论文提供的了参考和指导。第四，本书同时为读者们清楚地指导了如何更加精准地收集资料，以及在论文准备阶段及撰写当中所必备的调查研究。
|
| 作者简介： |
|
Steven Foster是考文垂大学法学院的主要讲师，教授法学技巧这门课程已超过30年，同时他在法学院中也教授法学写作与研究的课程。
|
| 章节目录： |
Contents
Prefaceii
Introduction:Howtousethisbookiii
Part1Preparingandwritinglawassignments
1 Writinglawassessmentsonundergraduatecourses
Somecommoncomplaints
Somebasicpoints
Note-takingandusingnoteswithothersources
WhatshouldIdowhenIgetanassignment?
Researchingforassessments
2 Presentationoflawassessments
Word-processedwork
Adoptinggoodpracticeingrammar,punctuationandspelling
Clearandcoherentwritingstyle
Avoidingplagiarism
Providingauthority
Readingoveryouranswer
Answeringthequestion
Writingcriticallyandgainingenhancedgrades
Summaryofwritingandpresentationalskills
Part2Writinglegalessays:Specificlegalskills
3 Usinglegalmaterials
Providingauthority
Usingcases
Usingstatutorymaterials
Usinglawjournals
Usingwebsites
4 Legalreferencingandcitation
Learnhowtocitecases
Citingstatutorymaterials
Citingjournals
Citingbooks
Citingwebsites
Bibliographies
ReferencesandLatinwordsandphrases
Summaryofusinglegalmaterials,referencingandcitation
5 Goodandbadessays
Introduction
Practice1:Contractlawessay
Practice2:Legalsystemandconstitutionallawessay
Summaryofgoodessaytechniques
Part3Answeringproblemandexamquestions
6 Answeringproblemquestions
Understandingproblemquestions
Tacklingproblemquestions
Practice1:Contractproblem
Practice2:Statutoryinterpretation/judicialreviewproblem
Summaryofproblem-solvingskills
7 Preparingforandansweringexamquestions
Generalexamskills
Therevisionprocess
Theexamination
Examplesofexamanswers
Practice1:Thecontractproblem
Practice2:Theconstitutionallawessay
Summaryofexaminationskills
Part4Tacklingextendedessaysandprojects
8Researchingandwritingadvancedessays
Extendedandadvancedessaysatundergraduatelevel
Undertakinggreaterresearch
Enhancedwritingandreferencingskills
Undergraduateprojects
Summaryofadvancedessayandprojectskills
Furtherreading
|
| 精彩片段： |
Makecasesworkforyou
Remember?youusecasestoenhanceyouranswer。Ensurethat
thecasehas
madeyouranswermoreauthoritativeandmoreconvincing。
Donotmakeyouranswerlessimpressivebytheuseofcases?
byamuddled
accountofthefactsanddecisionorbyaconfused
explanationofitsratioor
importance。
Example
｀Thecourtshavealwaysupheldindividuallibertyandhave
safeguardedsuchliberty
fromarbitrarygovernmentalinterference。InEntickv
Carrington＿referenceヽthecourt
upheldtheindividual¨srighttoprivacywhentheyheldthat
thepolicehadnorightto
seizetheplaintiff¨sproperty?eventhoughtheSecretaryof
Statesaidtheycoulddoit。
Thiscaseshowsthatfreedomofexpressionhasalwaysbeen
important。¨
Theinitialpointiswellmade?butwhenthecaseis
introduced?theauthorhas
madesomemistakesonthefacts?therelevantlawandthe
ratioofthecase?and
thereaderisthusconfusedaboutwhathappenedinthecase
anditsimportance。
Thecasecouldbeexplainedthus?
Example
｀Thecourtshavealwaysupheldindividuallibertyandhave
safeguardedsuchliberty
fromarbitrarygovernmentalinterference。InEntickv
Carrington＿referenceヽitwasheld
thatintheabsenceoflegalauthortityatrespassonthe
claimant¨spropertyinthe
nameofstatenecessitywasactionableintheordinary
courts。Thecaseillustrates
theprinciplethatthegovernmentisboundbythelawand
mustprovideformallegal
authorityforitsactions。
Introducethecaseinthecontextofthequestion
orthepointthatyouaretryingtomake
Somestudentsjustdropcasesintotheiranswerwithout
explainingtheirrelevance
orwhatpurposethecaseisserving。
Example
｀Thegroundsofjudicialreviewincludesubstantiveaswell
asproceduralwrongdoing。
InCongrevevHomeOfficetheMinisterhadrecalledvalidly
grantedtelevisionlicences
andCongreveclaimedthatthiswasnotallowed。Itwasheld
thattheMinisterhadno
righttorevokethelicence。¨
Thisaccountofthecasedoesnottellthereaderwhythis
case?asopposedto
others?hasbeenchoseninillustration。Neitherdoesthe
studentusethecaseto
illustratethepreviousstatement?itdoesnottellthe
readerwhethertherewas
substantiveorproceduralwrongdoing?whatthedifferenceis
betweenthetwo?
orwhythecourtthoughtitwasbeyondtheMinister¨spowers
todowhathedid。
|
| 书 评： |
|
|
| 其 它： |
|
|
|
中国大学出版社协会 |
首页 |
宏观指导 |
出版社天地 |
图书代办站 |
教材图书信息 |
教材图书评论 |
在线订购 |
教材征订
